logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.02.04 2015나8668
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following contents to the “facts,” which is the first head, the fifth, of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary Note: The fact that the decision of recommending the settlement of this case was not written in relation to the provisional seizure against real estate (No. 2013Kadan38777) at the request of the Plaintiff on September 19, 2014, and the Defendant delivered to the Plaintiff documents concerning the withdrawal and cancellation of provisional seizure on the same day (the Plaintiff asserted that even before September 19, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the withdrawal and cancellation of provisional seizure, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

[Judgment]

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow