beta
Text
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant E merely lent money to Co-Defendant D with the knowledge that Co-Defendant D’s gambling opening, and did not open gambling in collusion with D, etc.
2. In light of the following circumstances, in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court as to Defendant E’s assertion of mistake of facts, it is reasonable to view Defendant E as having conducted gambling in collusion with D, etc. instead of merely lending money that Defendant E would use for gambling opening. As such, Defendant E’s assertion on this part is rejected.
A. On December 19, 201, D decided to open a private gambling house from the early police officer on December 201. On December 19, 2011, D leased Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ltel 1901 (hereinafter “instant officetel”) at KRW 10 million and KRW 6.5 million per month of rent, and proposed that A and Defendant B, who were known to the general public, play the role of “security” in the above gambling place.
In addition, D entered the J in the usual gambling place through M, and entered K as a 'clicking' to invite customers at the gambling place, and from December 24, 201 to January 10, 2012, D opened gambling for three times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.
B. Defendant E and D had a series of gamblings, and Defendant E and D worked as an employee at Q hotel operated by Defendant E.
C. On December 19, 201, Defendant E entered into a provisional contract with a licensed real estate agent office at the time of leasing the instant officetel, and the lease deposit also is as follows.
As seen in this subsection, Defendant E was paid as money remitted to Defendant E. D.
Defendant
The details of money received by E and D through the Defendant’s Gwangju Bank account (V) from November 29, 2011 to January 18, 2012 are as follows and the table:
Defendant
E. D.