logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.04.28 2016고단627
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants jointly and severally reported on March 29, 2016, the roads in front of the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2016, and the “one hundred and Fifteen members of the 119 Emergency Medical Service,” and recorded video pictures with a slope G belonging to the F District of the Seocheon-gu Police Station, which called on the site after receiving a report, and with H’s face and body sealed.

G’s hand Hand Handphones the floor, Defendant B pushed the body of G and H, which the Defendant was likely to take the wall, and Defendant A obstructed the Defendant from taking the wall, thereby pushing the Defendant with G and H’s body that the Defendant was likely to take the wall.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Application of course photographs and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine for the crime

2. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

3. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants’ reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendants’ misjudgmention in depth, and there are circumstances to consider the developments leading up to the instant occurrence ( Defendant B reported to 119 by Defendant B, who was taking emergency measures against the Defendant A, and 119 members were dispatched to the site relatively late, and there seems to have been a dispute with the police officers dispatched in the course of the instant action).

Defendant

A is an initial crime, and Defendant B is only one time before the minor fine is imposed, and the defendants have yet to be aged, etc. shall be determined by the same order in consideration of the fact that the defendants are still under the age.

arrow