A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The crime on March 4, 2015;

A. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), at a “D” restaurant located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, where he received a report from the Defendant E, that “A drives a freight vehicle in the state of drinking and went to a D restaurant,” and carried the vehicle to the F police box located in H in the Gyeonggi-gu, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si.

On March 4, 2015, at around 22:40 on March 4, 2015, the Defendant was required to respond to a police officer’s request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was required to comply with the alcohol testing by inserting three minutes of the alcohol measuring instrument for about 30 minutes from the above slope G, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Defendant was in an inaccurate state of drinking, unstable walking, and he/she was bread by the snow.

B. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant, at around 19:30, operated an I truck without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 20 km from the place where the sports is south-gu, Jinyang-si, Jinyang-si, to the above “D” restaurant located in Mancheon-si C.

2. The crime on April 24, 2015;

A. The Defendant is a person engaging in IF driving service. The Defendant is a person who is in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

On April 24, 2015, around 08:10 around 08:0, the Defendant entered the road adjacent to the 16th degree of the village post office located adjacent to the 16th degree of Mapocheon-ro into the two-lanes of the 87 national highways.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by entering the road, after temporarily stopping the motor vehicle, after confirming whether another motor vehicle is only another motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and neglected on the part of the victim J(31) driving that the Defendant got on the right side from the left side of the cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant due to the occupational negligence that entered the said national highway.