logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.06 2014고합580
현주건조물방화치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2014, around 12:30 on July 12:30, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in his/her and his/her family's residence 3:06 of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 306th century,

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the entire inside of the above housing No. 306 and destroyed the said housing No. 305 of the victim D (e.g., 57 years old) by continuously extinguishing the fire and continuously extinguishing the fire to the victim D (e.g., 57 years old) by putting the blick in the clothes, etc. on the entrance side of the entrance of the entrance of the entrance, and attaching the fire to the building by placing it on the wall.

Therefore, the Defendant destroyed the victim D’s house to take an internal repair cost of KRW 4 million due to the fire extinguishment of the above fire, etc., and caused property damage to the victim E (the age of 72) residing in 206 of the same house to the extent that the market internal repair cost is sufficient, and caused property damage to the victim FF (the age of 55) residing in 106 of the same house with the market value of KRW 7,545,500, and caused property damage to the victim F (the age of 55) residing in 106 of the same house with the inside repair cost of KRW 7,545,500 for about a week medical treatment to the above D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. In the event of an investigation report, each investigation report (in relation to attachment of an investigative photograph, attachment to the 119-dong Order and the 112-reported Report Report), the fact that the defendant and the defense counsel did not constitute the injury as provided for the crime of injury to the present state building or fire because the injury to the victim D is insignificant. However, according to the evidence adopted by the court and examined by this court, the victim D was hospitalized for four days due to the occurrence of a fire, and the above degree of injury is extremely minor.

arrow