The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The punishment of the court below (the penalty of four months of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, and six million won in total) is too unreasonable compared to the nature of the defendant's crime in the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle, ought to respect the determination of sentencing in cases where there exists a unique area of the first instance court, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Even if the materials submitted in the trial at the trial, there is no significant change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and comprehensively taking account of all the factors indicated in the records of this case, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.