logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.07.22 2020고단4001
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 27, 2010, the defendant was issued a summary order of 1.5 million won by the Incheon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 18, 2020, at around 19:20, the Defendant driven an Esch Rex sport strawing car at approximately KRW 0.099% under the influence of alcohol concentration at approximately 900 meters from the street corner of convenience store in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the same Gu D apartment parking lot.

Accordingly, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and investigation reports (a summary order attached to the same type of power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 53 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order was that the defendant had been punished for a drunk driving, but he was killed in the accident while driving again.

However, the records of the same crime are 10 years prior to the date of criminal punishment, there are no records of criminal punishment, and the disposal of the vehicle and the fact that the disposal of the vehicle does not drive the vehicle again, etc., shall be considered as favorable factors, and the degree of external exploitation, age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and other sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records of this case shall be determined as ordered

arrow