beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff (Appointeds) KRW 25,749,02; (b) against the appointed parties B, KRW 19,828,982; and (c) against each said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) as follows: (a) around 01:00 on December 31, 2010, C driven a DST5 car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and neglected to perform the duty of front-time watch while driving the two-lane of the F station in front of the F station in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, while neglecting the duty of front-time watch, and (b) caused the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) who was on board the Plaintiff’s front-time part of the Defendant vehicle that was temporarily stopped for signal atmosphere on the front-round the front-round road of the F station in front of the F station in front of the F station in Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul, caused the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) who was on board the Defendant vehicle by shocking the front-way part of the vehicle in front of the front-round part of the Defendant vehicle.
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings]
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the Appointed B (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") due to the accident in this case as an insurer of the defendant's vehicle.
C. The defendant asserts that the accident of this case is very minor and the accident of this case is likely to cause a king or a sediment disease that the plaintiffs claimed, and there is no causal relationship with the accident of this case, and even if the family causal relationship is acknowledged, the defendant's liability should be limited considering the fact that the plaintiffs did not wear the safety level at the time of the accident of this case.
According to the results of each physical appraisal of the director of the Synish University of this Court, the plaintiffs suffered injury, such as the above facts, due to the accident in this case.