logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.23 2017노1107
근로기준법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of suspended sentence to eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in light of the following facts: the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflects the defendant's mistake; the substitute payment of the amount equivalent to the victimized workers after the closure of the company was paid to the victimized workers after the closure of the company; the first offender is recognized, but the court below and the punishment have not yet been recovered, and there are no changes in circumstances that make the judgment of the court below and the punishment different from the judgment of the court below have yet to be determined; and the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, economic situation, circumstances leading to the crime and motive, and all other matters on the sentencing as indicated in the records and the theory of change in the case. Thus, the defendant's

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow