All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of this case’s facts charged (except for the portion without charge) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on intentional or publicly alleged crime of breach of trust, loss of property and breach of trust, calculation of the

2. As to the reasons for the Prosecutor’s appeal, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Prosecutor on the instant facts charged (excluding the guilty part) on the ground that there was no proof of a crime, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of flag and Article 85 (2) of the Saemaeul Cooperatives Act.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.