logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.26 2019가단538636
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed D:

(a) the real estate listed in the annex 2 list;

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as shown in attached Form 1;

2. Judgment with no applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) sought unjust enrichment from September 20 to October 19, 2018 against the Defendants from September 20, 2018 to the completion date of delivery of real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2. However, according to the evidence No. 3, it can be recognized that Defendant B, a lessee, paid the rent to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) during October 19, 2018, out of the rent of the month after June 20, 2017 under the lease agreement. As such, among the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the portion of claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of the Plaintiff’s rent from September 20, 2018 to October 19, 2018 is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow