logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.11.14 2017고단967
산지관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 967]

1. A person who intends to divert a mountainous district in violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts shall obtain permission from the Administrator of the National Forest Service, etc. specifying its use;

Defendant

A appears to be a clerical error in the facts charged in 2017.

2. 15. Mountainous districts were diverted by means of damaging a forest equivalent to 918m2 in Gwangju-si without obtaining permission for mountainous district conversion and installing retaining walls to prevent earth and sand.

2. Any person who intends to change the form and quality of land in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission for development activities from the competent authority;

Defendant

A appears to be a clerical error in the facts charged in 2017.

2. 15. The form and quality of land was changed by installing retaining walls to prevent soil erosion and damage to forest land equivalent to 918 square meters in Gwangju City, Gwangju City, without obtaining permission for development activities.

[2017 high group 2215] No person may register a real right to real estate in the name of a trustee under the name of a trust agreement under the name of the trustee.

On October 2015, the Defendants agreed to register the land F. F. F. 2,480 square meters owned by Defendant A in the name of Defendant B with respect to the said land, and registered the ownership transfer on October 6, 2015. On December 27, 2016, the Defendants agreed to register the said land in the name of Defendant B with respect to the building for agricultural storage of 320 square meters in size on the F and G land owned by Defendant A and the building for agricultural storage of 162.69 square meters in size on H land, and registered the ownership preservation in the name of Defendant B on December 27, 2016.

As a result, Defendant A entrusted the real right to real estate in the name of trust, and Defendant B entrusted the real estate in the name of name.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 967]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written accusation;

1. Location map and on-site photographs;

1. A certificate of land use plan (2017 order 2215);

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1.Each.

arrow