beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 680,484,305 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 24, 2013 to January 18, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works and the progress of construction works 1) on January 21, 2009 as a person who was a stock company on January 21, 2009 (hereinafter “person construction”).
the bridge A(hereinafter referred to as the “instant bridge”) shall be called the Bridge.
2) The construction of a road and an urban planning road (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”).
(1) The owner’s order of design and construction is the first design of the instant construction project (hereinafter “the first design”) around October 2010.
Upon completion of the construction project, the Plaintiff submitted the design plan to the Plaintiff. 2) Down Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”) and Down Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”) and Daehan Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”) were contracted with the Plaintiff on January 13, 201, with the construction cost of KRW 5,170,729,000, and the construction period of the instant construction from January 24, 2011 to July 16, 2012 (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”). The instant construction contract entered into a modified contract regarding the construction period, etc. (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”). At the time of the instant construction contract, tender offer, special tender offer, public notice of tender contract, tender report on integrity contract, special construction contract drawings, construction contract terms and conditions, general subcontract details (including particulars).
3) However, around May 201, a civil petition related to the instant project was filed and the redesign on the instant bridge was required. Accordingly, the instant construction project is deemed a civil engineering corporation (hereinafter “civil engineering”).
(4) The Plaintiff, upon receiving “the need for civil petition occurrence and redesign,” and “design review report” from the civil engineering, submitted to the Plaintiff the “structure design review service”. From June 2011, the Plaintiff suspended the instant construction from June 28, 201.