A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 11, 2002, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violation of road traffic law from the Suwon Franchi, on December 2, 2008, a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for the same crime from the vice branch branch of the Incheon District Court, and on September 9, 201, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a fine for the same crime from the vice branch of the Incheon District Court.

[2] On March 19, 2017, the Defendant driven a D car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.063 percent at the section of approximately 300 meters from the Do in front of the “cafeteria where the scam is located” located at the Ansan-dong located at the same time, for the same time from March 19, 2017, to the road front of the entrance of the 300-day Dorosan-dong.

around 23:04 on March 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 716,” was under the influence of 0.091% of alcohol in blood at the center of the central university of Ansan-si on the 112 rist rist list list sist sind sind sind sind sind sind sind 112.5 meters of alcohol in blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving under drinking, inquiry into the results of crackdown on driving under drinking, and a statement on the circumstances of the driver under driving under drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the previous summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of the circumstances following the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, the same sentence as the order shall be determined.

- Despite the history of punishment several times for the same crime, each of the crimes of this case has been committed, but again, provided that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and that there is no record of criminal punishment by the defendant. - The defendant is against his fault.