1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following “the second order”, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The ground of appeal No. 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance on the same part.

(1) The phrase “20 square meters G road in Gwangju-si” in paragraph 1 shall be deemed to read “F road in Gwangju-si, F.220 square meters.”

o The reasoning of the first instance judgment No. 3. A.

(1) Of the table of subsection (1), the term “transfer of ownership on October 2, 2001” shall be read as “transfer of ownership on October 12, 2001” in the course of ownership and division.

o The reasoning of the first instance judgment No. 3. A.

(3) Paragraphs 11-13 of this paragraph deleted the phrase “Defendant E submitted a letter of reasons for ensuring the failure to leave the road at the time of Gwangju Metropolitan City around June 2007, the letter of consent to the use of land in the name of Y (the letter of consent to the use of the road).”

o The reasoning of the first instance judgment No. 3. A.

(5)In Part 5, the phrase “not only Z land” shall be changed to “not only M land” in the real estate indication column.

o) On the 6th page 1 to 3 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, "(based on recognition), Gap 1, 5, Eul 1 through 3, Eul 1, Eul 1, Eul 1 to 3, witness W's testimony, witness W's testimony in the Gwangju market, inquiry inquiry letter of February 15, 2019, document delivery letter of February 20, 2019, June 17, 2019, and inquiry letter of fact inquiry of June 17, 2019" are as follows: "(based on recognition) Gap 1, 5, Eul 1 through 3, Eul 1, Eul 1, Eul 1, and Eul 1, witness testimony of the first instance court, witness testimony of the first instance court to the Gwangju market of the first instance court, and fact inquiry letter of June 1, 2017," respectively.

o No. 6-13 of the first instance judgment is as follows.

“The Plaintiff owned 151/220 shares of the instant land; the Defendants used the instant land as a road without completing the registration of transfer of shares on the instant land; as seen earlier, H acquired the Plaintiff’s land adjacent to the instant land from the Plaintiff on May 27, 2004, 69/220 shares of the instant land among the instant land.