logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2013.10.16 2012가단5858
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 100,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 3, 2011 to November 6, 2012 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. When Defendant B was appointed as a public official on January 17, 1997 and was deemed to have suffered loss from stock investment in the Ycheon-gun Office C, Ycheon-gun, which was working for the said land, Defendant B received money from the Plaintiff on several occasions from April 201 to June 201, 201 in the name of Ycheon-gun, Ycheon-gun, the neighboring area of the land scheduled for the relocation of the Ycheon-do Office, or from 17,851 square meters of each piece of land, indicating the existence of the Ycheon-gun’s basic information about each of the above land, and after confirming the existence of the Ycheon-gun’s account number on 10,000,000 won, it was found that Defendant B received money from the Plaintiff 28,000,000 won in the name of the said Ycheon-gun, Ycheon-gun, Ycheon-gun to immediately keep the 100,000 won.

(hereinafter “instant tort”). (b)

Defendant B, for a period of six years similar to the tort in this case, obtained money in an amount of KRW 5.7238 million from 26 victims including the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff, and was prosecuted for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc. of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) and was charged on March 7, 2013 and was in prison in Daegu District Court Decision 2012Gohap102, Daegu District Court Decision 2012Gohap116, 2013Gohap6 (Joint).

(See Supreme Court Decision 2013No147 Decided June 20, 2013, on June 28, 2013, the dismissal of the appeal of the Daegu High Court Decision 2013No147, Jun. 28, 2013). (Reasons for recognition) B B: The facts that there is no dispute between the parties, the evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 2-2, 3, 5-1 through 9, the evidence Nos. 5-1 through 4, the entire purport of the pleadings, the result of the Defendant B’s examination, the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Defendant B

arrow