beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 728,91,780 won to Plaintiff A; 433,722,120 won to Plaintiff B; 193,522,120 won to Plaintiff C; and the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 29, 2010, Plaintiff A received the order to seize and collect the claim amounting to KRW 728,91,780 among the claims, such as the performance agency service charges, etc. under the implementation agency service contract held against the Defendant, and the above order was served on the Defendant on August 2, 2010, as the title of the Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2009Gahap10403 Decided E (hereinafter “E”) as the Seoul Northern District Court Decision No. 2010, Jul. 29, 2010.
B. On July 6, 2009, the Seoul Northern District Court 2009TTTT 8690, Plaintiff B issued a collection order for the claim seizure and collection against KRW 433,722,120 among the claim for the execution service expenses under the execution service contract held by E against the Defendant, with the title of execution of the authentic promissory notes with the executory power of No. 264, 2009, which was issued by the notary public against E, as the Seoul Northern District Court 2009TT 8690. The above order was served on the Defendant on July 9, 2009.
C. On May 27, 2010, the Plaintiff C received a collection order for the seizure and collection of KRW 193,522,120 of the cost of the enforcement service under the enforcement service contract held against the Defendant by a notary public of Korea, as Seoul Northern District Court 2010TTTT 949, with the title of execution of a promissorysory note with the executory force of No. 717, 2010 as the document of the document of the preparation of the law office in North-dong, Seoul Northern District Court, and the said order was served on the Defendant on May 31, 2010.
Plaintiff
On May 24, 2010, Cho Jong-po Co., Ltd. (Seoul Northern District Court 2010TTTT 2010TT 9157) issued a collection order for 255,602,00 won among the bonds of the execution service cost under the execution service contract that Eul has against the defendant, with the title of title of the notarial deed of the bill with the executory power of No. 179 of Seoul Northern District Court 2010TT 201, and the above order was served on the defendant on May 27, 2010.
[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
(a)the cause of the claim;