A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

(a)in the application of the Annex I [Attachment I], -A [Attachment II], -A, -A, statement of deposit transactions without passbook (post offices, etc.), list of deposit transactions without passbook (A), and e-mail (P, S) and agricultural legislation;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts; Articles 49(4)1 and 49(3)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; Article 30 (Transfer of Access Media) of the Criminal Act; and each choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 32(1) and 32(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation (the applicant’s consent that the compensation is not appropriate to issue an order for compensation in the criminal procedure of this case)

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] systematic frauds (less than KRW 100 million) where significant damage has been restored to the basic area (one year and six months to three years) (special mitigation (person subject to special mitigation)) / Where a large number of unspecified or unspecified victims or repeatedly commits a crime for a considerable period of time; * In concurrent crimes with crimes for which the sentencing criteria have not been set, the lower limit of the above sentencing range shall be considered;

2. In this case, the determination of sentence is highly likely to cause severe social prejudice due to the screening of so-called phishing fraud crime that is systematically and systematically conducted against many and unspecified persons, and such crime is subdivided the roles of each person and organized by connecting with other accomplices in order. Therefore, even if the degree of participation is insignificant, it is necessary to reduce the degree of participation. In light of the fact that the Defendant, while acting as a measure for collecting cash of the phishing criminal organization, transfers a large number of copies of cash, and the degree of participation in the crime by transferring a large number of copies of bankbooks and other access media, the degree of participation in the crime is not easy, it is inevitable to sentence sentence on the Defendant, on the grounds that the Defendant is a criminal charge

However, the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, there is no record that the defendant has been punished for the same crime, and it is significant to commit the crime of this case.