logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고단2614
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for an attempt to larceny at night at the Seoul Northern District Court, and on June 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 24, 2015, and the suspended sentence became final and conclusive, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Jinju Prison.

[2] On June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (b) up to the “E” store operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu; (c) up to the total market price of KRW 368,00,00 in front of the said store; (d) KRW 20 km of rice, KRW 368,00, and KRW 20 km of rice, KRW 1 1 k, 15 kg of rice, 15 g, and 1 g of ground be loaded in the handets.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

The Defendant, around 17:21 on June 18, 2017, 2017, stolen one Rod bicycle bicycle, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 300,000,00,00 from the victim G-owned G, which was set up in front of the F store in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, by a method of turning it into the finger.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 2614]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A criminal investigation report (specific suspect) (2017 high-ranking 2857);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the G victim;

1. Data of CCTV photographs (before judgment);

1. In order to inquire about the criminal history of the 2017 High Order 2614 Case, and the application of statutes on the status of personal confinement;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is that the defendant confessions and reflects each of the crimes of this case, the amount of damage of this case is not significant, among the victims, D is between the defendant and his father and the victim's father and the victim's bicycle of this case's bicycle of this case has been in the form of a removal after the defendant faces.

arrow