1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where part of the judgment is rewritten or added or deleted as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Each part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the product of this case” of the first instance Nos. 6 and No. 4 and 18 shall be added to “the F agency” following the “the product of this case.”

Part VI of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from the 19th "(the same as this)" to the 21st "(the same as this).

Part VII through 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed by the following:

(A) From April 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018, the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion on damages equivalent to lost earnings was subject to the Defendant’s disposition of suspension of business and restriction on participation in the bidding for five months from April 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018, and the Plaintiff failed to conduct business for five months from April 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018. Thus, the Defendant shall compensate for damages of KRW 56,130,130, which is equivalent to the operating income during the pertinent period. (2) We examine whether the Plaintiff’s assertion on damages in proximate with the instant tort.

The facts that the Plaintiff was subject to the disposition of the instant suspension of business due to the instant tort are as seen earlier by supplying the instant products with the expiration of the distribution period, and comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement in the evidence Nos. 9 and 10, the Plaintiff was subject to sanctions against the Plaintiff, who was subject to the disposition of the instant suspension of business, such as the disposition of the instant suspension of business, for three months from the expiration date of the administrative disposition. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was subject to restrictions on participation in the instant suspension of business for three months from May 3, 2018 to August 2, 2018, which is the day following the expiration date of the instant suspension of business.