logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.08.27 2013나57001
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The court's reasoning concerning this part of the basic facts is as follows: ① The phrase "comprehion 12" of the first instance court's 35,000 shares "by unanimous consent of five shareholders present with a total of 32,340 shares of 35,00 shares; ② Except for the second instance court's 4, 19, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, and 5, "the purport of the claim" is "the purport of the claim and appeal", and thus, it is identical to the statement of Paragraph (1) of the reasons of the first instance court's judgment (as of 3, 18, 5, 7) (as of 5, 500 shares). Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. 1) The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s previous shareholders D, E, F, G, H, and J (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s previous shareholders”).

(3) On June 2, 2005, GelD Sclus Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “GelD Sclus”) are GelD Slus Co., Ltd.

(2) The Plaintiff’s previous shareholders received KRW 2.5 billion from July 4, 2005 the intermediate payment of KRW 2.5 billion, and then resigned from the executive officers. The instant sales contract concluded on September 26, 2005, which was concluded on the part of the Plaintiff’s management, or concluded on the part of the former representative director D who is not capable of representing the Plaintiff. The Defendants have a duty to delete each registration, which was completed in accordance with the instant sales contract, based on the premise that the registration or the registration completed in accordance with the instant sales contract, which was not effective against the Plaintiff, is valid, and the purport of the appeal and the purport of the purport of the claim, which is the registration completed in accordance with the premise that the registration is valid against the Plaintiff. 2) 4 through 10, 100, 200, 200, and 25, and the following facts are acknowledged, comprehensively taking account of the following:

arrow