logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.22 2017가단116815
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 10, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied the Plaintiff with freeboard; and (b) concluded a contract for the clinical processing of the production of the double-story with the content that the Plaintiff would make and deliver the double-story glass using it to the Defendant; and (c) then receive the cost of the clinical processing from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”); and (d) continued to engage in clinical processing transactions on the basis thereof, and the contractual relationship was terminated around March 2015.

B. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement of KRW 316,017,591 on the ground of the claim for unjust enrichment return, etc. equivalent to the amount of KRW 62 million from the business consultation on February 18, 2014 and the amount of KRW 315,05,00,000, and the amount of KRW 316,01 after processing the lawsuit. The Plaintiff filed a claim for offset against the Defendant’s claim with the amount of KRW 316,01,59,00 from December 12, 2013 to March 2015. The said lawsuit was brought against the Defendant’s claim for reimbursement of KRW 315,00,000,000, KRW 20,000,000 and KRW 20,000,000,000, KRW 30,000,000,000,000.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsured Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 18, 24 and Eul evidence No. 1, and arguments.

arrow