1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for amendments in part of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Corrections or additions to the decision of the court of first instance shall be as follows, Chapters 3, 17, 13, 17, and 4:

The issue of this case is whether C has the nature of a union under the Civil Act or whether it has the nature of a life-free contract or a loan for consumption similar to that of a mutual credit union under Article 2 of the former Mutual Saving and Finance Company Act. The so-called mutual savings and finance company has the nature of a contract similar to a loan for consumption. The so-called mutual savings and finance company also has the nature of a contract similar to a loan for consumption. The legal nature of this case changes according to the form of the purpose and method of organizing it, the method of providing water, the method of paying water before and after payment, the method of paying water, the relationship between the fraternity and the fraternity, and any other relationship between the fraternity and the fraternity, and it is operated in the subordinate relationship between the fraternity and the fraternity, and it is operated in the mutual savings and finance company under Article 2 of the former Mutual Savings and Finance Company Act.