A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2013, at around 22:13, the Defendant driven B rocketing car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 200 meters from the front day of the instant Dog-Eup’s Dog-si to the front day of the original public health clinic where the said Dog-Eup was located.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the status of running a motor vehicle under consideration, a report on the status of running a motor vehicle under consideration, and a report on the status of the driver under consideration;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the hostile inquiry;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant, for sentencing reasons of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, has already been punished several times due to drinking driving, driving without license, etc., the crime is not less complicated in light of the fact that he/she again committed the crime.

However, the sentence shall be determined in consideration of various sentencing factors, such as the defendant's age, occupation, and criminal records, including the fact that the defendant is against the recognition of the crime, and the sentence of suspension of execution is to be imposed on the condition that the order