A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Provided, That the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2005, the Defendant leased 301,401, and operated a dance hall for the operation of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, and on April 30, 2009, the name of the building was made according to the protocol of conciliation.

In 2011, the Defendant, who became aware of the commencement of a reconstruction project and the payment of life-saving expenses to the lessee, was unable to receive the money by the court’s protocol due to the payment of the rent, etc. before the reconstruction project, but did not receive the said relocation expenses by the court’s protocol, he did not receive the said relocation expenses.

1. From around 08:00 to 16:00 on November 25, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the work performance of reconstruction works by force, as shown in the separate sheet of crime, by preventing any equipment listed on the heavy equipment during the work from traveling and blocking the people who are in charge of removal work, thereby obstructing the work performance of reconstruction works by force, such as interfering with the operation of equipment during the period from around 08:0 to around 16:00, and “the resolution of the operation compensation in the building and the construction damage.” In addition, the Defendant interfered with the reconstruction works by force on seven occasions by obstructing the operation of equipment during the period from around December 5, 2012, preventing the parts of the construction site from traveling and blocking them.

2. On November 26, 2012, the Defendant, in response to the withdrawal, was urged by the head of the site site office of the reconstruction project, to leave the site office of the Cbuilding on November 26, 2012, and to withdraw from the site office of the reconstruction project, and did not comply with the demand by the head of the site office of the reconstruction project.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Proxy letter or written waiver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of each construction site;

1. Interference with relevant legal assistance concerning criminal facts: Article 314 of the Criminal Act;