A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 10, 2013, the Defendant, via a telephone from the French land on June 10, 2013, is expected to receive a loan from the victim C with a loan from the victim C by means of a telephone. The Defendant would receive a loan from the victim C with a loan of KRW 20 million as expenses are required.

“A false statement” was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant had not been able to obtain additional loans due to the fact that the E church, which held office as a pastor, was in excess of 1.3 billion won due to the failure to pay interest to the No. 1.3 billion won, and the No. 3 was already established on the land and building of the above church site and building, and thus it is unclear whether to receive additional loans even through D, and if it is not an additional loan, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the loan to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 15 million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) in the name of F on the same day from the victim.

2. On July 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around July 8, 2013, via a telephone, to the victim C by means of a loan from the Gwangju Bank through H; (b) the Defendant would receive a loan from the Gwangju Bank through H; and (c) the Defendant would receive a loan with a loan of KRW 150 million as cost is required, and repay it within three days.

When a loan is granted, it shall be repaid up to 15 million won borrowed previously.

“A false statement” was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant had not been able to receive additional loans even through H due to the fact that the E church in office as a pastor was in excess of the interest 1.3 billion won for the No. 13 billion won for the No. 1, and the No. 130 million won for the said church site and building was already established, and thus it is unclear whether additional loans can be received, and if the additional loans were not made, the Defendant did not have the ability to repay the loan to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 97 million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (I) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;