1. The part on the Plaintiff’s claim for the delivery of a building against the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) in the instant principal lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1 between the parties (formerly: D Co., Ltd.) is a company established on January 24, 201 for the purpose of manufacturing business of parts of industrial machinery and tools. 2) Defendant B was the Plaintiff’s inside director, and Defendant C was the Plaintiff’s father, who was the Plaintiff’s factory. On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff dismissed Defendant B from the Plaintiff’s inside director and dismissed Defendant C from the Plaintiff’s factory site.

B. On August 3, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) between F and F, who leased a building listed in the attached Table 1 list from E on August 3, 201, indicated in the attached Table 1, the part of the part of the office of single story in the connected ship, in turn, 6, 7, 8, and 5 of the attached Form No. 1 among the buildings listed in the attached Table 1 list, shall be deemed to be the part of the office of single story in the connected ship (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the part of the instant building”) in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the buildings listed in the attached Table 1 list.

(2) On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff dismissed and dismissed the Defendants on April 20, 201, and the Defendants concluded a sublease contract with F as to the instant building from August 3, 201 to August 3, 2013, with the period of 7,500,000,000 monthly rent, and from August 3, 2011, to F until February 23, 2015, with the payment of rent, as seen earlier, the Defendants entered the instant portion of the building as deposit money,50,000,000,000 won as to the instant building, and the Defendants entered the instant portion of the building into a sub-lease contract with F and F as to the goods of this case from August 3, 2015 to February 23, 2015.

【Ground of recognition” has no dispute, Gap 1 through 3, 8, 12, and Eul 1 through 4 respectively.