1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts, which have become final and conclusive in the judgment subject to a retrial, are apparent or apparent in records in this court:

On February 4, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the Jung-gu District Court 2015Kahap54704, the first Incheon District Court 2015Kadan2500, but was transferred.

As stated in the purport of the claim against the defendant, the "verification of nullity of the application for the change of the use of electricity", "the purpose of the electric supply contract and the implementation of the procedure for the change of the type of contract", and "10,000,000 won for consolation money and damages for delay have been filed."

B. On May 18, 2016, the above court dismissed each of the claims for “verification of invalidation of an application for electric change” and “implementation of the purpose of electric supply contract and the procedure for modification of each type of contract” and rendered a judgment dismissing the remainder of claims (hereinafter “the judgment on review”). The judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2016, as the Plaintiff did not appeal.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the judgment subject to a retrial is unlawful as follows, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim should be accepted.

The judgment subject to a review is a violation of the rules of evidence by believing that the defendant issued the defendant in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, and that the content of the decision is true with the application for the change of electric use in the name of D, a false document.

B. The judgment subject to a retrial is a violation of the rules of evidence by believing that “The whole water tank storage room and well-being equipment owned by the Plaintiff was used to spread underground water used by the residents of the Republic of Korea as potable water or water for living, and thus, the purpose of the use of the electricity supply contract for it was applied for” or other public purposes of the J, “the Plaintiff may change the term “from the industry to the dwelling, and at any time make a request for change to the dwelling,” and that “the Plaintiff may change the term “from the industry” to the dwelling, and make a request for change at any time.”

3. Determination

A. Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act may bring an action for retrial.