The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around 16:05 on April 26, 2016, driven a Han River Duo-ro under the Han River Duo-ro, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Nowon-gu, with a two-lanes of the Han River Duo-ro, and proceeded with the Black-dong Duo-dong Duo-ro, along the two-lanes between the three-lanes, on the same lane.

D The victim E, who is a driver of a taxi, was fluored about 5 seconds, was fluortly fluortly fluortly fluor, and fluortly fluort fluort fluor, and fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluor, and threatened the victim.

2. In a criminal trial, the burden of proving the facts constituting an offense prosecuted in the criminal trial is the prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is based on the evidence with probative value sufficient for a judge to have the truth of the facts charged to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt of guilt against the defendant, it is inevitable to determine the defendant as the benefit of the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do10316, Jan. 16, 2014). In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and duly examined by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone excluded a reasonable doubt and threatened the defendant E, a taxi driver, by carrying a dangerous article, without taking advantage of the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

① On the black video image of the above taxi, E continues to sound the light for the reason that the defendant who was driven along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of this letter would interfere with his driving, and it is confirmed that the son, the defendant, and the defendant look at E in the process, and in the process, E is a tree's passenger "I ????????? I ????????? I ??????? I ????? I ??? I ?? I ???

This is prompt.