The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant broadcast to the effect that “I am aware that I am dye, I am dye, I am dye, I am sye and dye I am sye I am sye I am sye I am sye I am sye I am sye I am sye I am am sye I am amsye I amsye I am in the market”; and (b) there was no fact that “I am sye I am sye I am in the market, I use I am dye I am sye I am I amsye I

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant operates “D” in the Si of Jung-Eup, and the victim E operates “G” in the next F.

The Defendant sought “D” customers who visited the said store and asked “G” and asked the Defendant’s whereabouts, but the victim’s mother respondeded to the customer at a corner to the customer, and had seeed that the victim’s her mother was frighten.

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant used the “G” operated by the victim while the merchants of H market and the customers who are not aware of the name of the H market using sound facilities connected to the spacker for administrative use installed on the rooftop of the above D building, and used the “G” as “Ispurine spurine spurine spurines in the market. One house is used in Korea during the market, and the Apurine spurine spurine is being imported.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

B. In order to establish a crime of defamation of the relevant legal doctrine, a person’s name is not necessarily required to be indicated with a false fact. However, in order to indicate false facts without a person’s name, the act of expressing false facts constitutes a crime of defamation of a specific person.