1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Although there is no collection obligation of KRW 3,339,294 under a contract for appointment of the Plaintiff on October 16, 2017 against the Defendant asserted by the Plaintiff, the Defendant sought the return of the said money, and thus, the Defendant is seeking confirmation of the absence of the said obligation.

2. Determination

A. If the evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including paper numbers) shows the overall purport of the oral argument, ① the Defendant entered into an agreement on commission of FC (hereinafter “commission agreement”) with the Plaintiff on October 16, 2017. ② The Plaintiff applied for settlement payment support to the Defendant on October 11, 2017 and received settlement support money KRW 3,339,294 from the Defendant around that time. ③ The Plaintiff’s application for settlement support document prepared by the Plaintiff was important matters, including “recommissioning or dismissing the Plaintiff from office for up to 12 months (within three consecutive months)” and the Plaintiff did not immediately explain the above contents of the contract, and the Plaintiff did not notify the Plaintiff of the fact that the contract was terminated within 10 months from 20 months from 20 months from 30 months from 20 months from 30 months from 28 months from 200.

According to the above facts, at the time of September 12, 2018, the Plaintiff constitutes a “uncommissioned Party for up to 12 consecutive months,” and the Defendant’s termination of the commission contract with the Plaintiff on this ground, and the commission contract was concluded on September 30, 2018.