A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CSB car.

On July 31, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 10:30, and sent the front road D at the Gyeonggi-si, E in front of the road at the front of the Dong-gu, Gyeonggi-do, to the front side of the front, in violation of the signal from the front side of the Dong-gu, to the left at a speed of about 20 km from the two-lanes of the two-lane.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system and by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop from a police officer to a second-lane in order to flee, and neglected to stop in the front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, and due to negligence, the G e-math loaded on the front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, which was driven by F, which was driven by F, which was driven by the front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the above cargo vehicle and escaped as it is, did not take necessary measures to ensure smooth flow of road traffic and prevent danger.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) provided that the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a section of about 3 km from the front of the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si to the front of the said accident site via the said accident site, without obtaining a temporary driver’s license under paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a substantial holder of C private car.

No person shall operate any automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the time and place of paragraph (1).