logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고정1729
배임증재
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged are as follows: (a) the fact that Defendant B was in breach of trust and the fact that the Defendant was in breach of trust was in the form of accepting it; (b) so, the form of the facts charged is somewhat modified, thereby recognizing the re-existence of the Defendant’s

B, from March 2015 to February 2017, 2017, a general director of the occupant representative meeting located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu Seoul apartment complex. The Defendant was the head of the camping market, the upper team of the top group doing business by sunrise, and the above top group continued the camping market in the above C apartment on October 19, 2015. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant prepared to set up the camping market and the alle market by sunrise.

A. On August 2016, 2016, B stated that “The Defendant promised to pay money to the Defendant on a condition that he will pay the night market in the middle-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the world department store neighboring the Hyundai department store.” Accordingly, the Defendant offered KRW 2 million to B.

B. B around the end of August 2016, in one’s own E-learning car parked in the vicinity of the modern department store located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul., the Defendant “I will at any time resolve the portion of the night market.”

“In order to carry out the night market”, the Defendant demanded to pay money, and accordingly, the Defendant offered KRW 1.5 million to B.

(c)

On August 2016, the Defendant offered KRW 500,00,00 to B, within the E-learning car located in the jurisdiction of the Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, that “When the contract between sunrise and sunrise expires with an enterprise already in September 1, 201, it would make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant made an illegal solicitation to B who deals with the affairs of others, and 8.5 million won was offered three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 357 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 357 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime and the choice of punishment;

arrow