beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.
On July 3, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car on July 21, 2013, and had approximately KRW 239 km point at the right time of the official city go along one-lane from the official zone to the tent.
At night, the E-Poter's cargo vehicle driven by the victim D (year 29) was a prior exclusive accident. In such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear, brakes, etc. while considering the traffic situation of the front line and prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and tried to avoid the collision by finding the cargo vehicle late later without being able to avoid the collision, but did not avoid the collision with the Defendant’s vehicle, and did not avoid the collision with the Defendant’s vehicle, caused the victim D and the victim F (35 years of age) who was on the cargo vehicle in the above cargo vehicle to leave the vehicle outside the cargo vehicle due to the shock of the victim D and the victim F (35 years of age) who was on the cargo vehicle in the above cargo vehicle, and exceeded the victim D by shocking the victim D with the front glass of the vehicle and falling off.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim D and the victim F due to the diversified damage in the above occupational negligence.
2. The defendant and his defense counsel's arguments are acknowledged that among the above facts charged, the defendant had shocked the vehicle driven by the victim D while driving around about 120 km/h at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue. However, with respect to the specific shocking part, unlike the above facts charged, the driver's seat is 3 clock from the direction of the vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue, and it was shocked that the driver's seat was loaded at the direction of the vehicle at the time of the accident at the point of the central separation.