logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.01.06 2016고단1104
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced by the Jeonju District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, to imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years, to imprisonment with prison labor for assault injury and larceny, and on February 26, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive on February 26, 2015, and on December 18, 2014, the execution of the above imprisonment with prison labor was terminated.

"2016 Highest 1104"

1. Special intimidation Defendant is C25 tons of dump truck driver.

A. On June 9, 2016, at around 14:30 of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant was running along one lane from the shooting distance of the Simsu, Simsu (Seoul, Seocho-gu) to the male of salt scam from the shooting distance of the Simsu, the Defendant was also fested on the wind to rapidly reduce the speed in order to avoid contact with other vehicles. On the ground that the F scam driven by the victim E (68 aged) who continued to run above, the Defendant also fright down several scams, and continued to drive about 1 km portion of the 1km portion at the front of G, and cut off the victim who driven along the same lane without a direction marking, etc. at the two-lanes, and then, dump truck “I scam and scam” is to be discarded from the above victim truck in the future.

“Fastly sound”.

B. On July 13, 2016, around 15:38, the Defendant was driving along the outer circular highway of the 4-lane in the city of Ansan-si in Gyeonggi-do along a one-lane from the IC region in the parallel of the victim H (33 tax) who driven a two-lane on the same road in the direction of the Simpo City in the parallel of Iknis in the direction of the victim who driven a two-lane on the same road. On the ground that the victim was flusing in the direction of the road and flusing the traffic of the victim, the Defendant was flusing the victim who driven along the two-lanes of the road in the direction of the direction of the 3-lane, and flusing the two-lanes of the above road into the direction of the direction of the flusp truck, and then the victim flusing from the dlusp truck in the future.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened victims by using dump trucks, which are dangerous objects, on two occasions.

2. The forgery of a private document;

arrow