Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment by the Seoul High Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (organization and activity of organizations, etc.), and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 16, 2012, and on January 9, 2013, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and two months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2013.

On July 6, 2010, at around 04:35, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim D (the age of 22) to return his/her match while drinking together with a middle-standing student who cannot know his/her name under the influence of alcohol, and talking with a middle-standing student; (b) it stated that the victim D “I would have ever ever been engaged in fishing, uniforming, and rioting; and (c) made the victim D’s face with a double-standing student who could not know his/her name.” On the two hand, the Defendant d was able to take the flick of the victim D’s flick and flicking the flick, thereby making the flick of the victim D’s flick.

Accordingly, when the victim D, along with the victim E (25 years of age) and F (19 years of age), used violence against the victim E (the victim E) and F (19 years of age), the victim victim D and the victim G (the victim 20 years of age) were exposed to each of the above violence events of the defendant, and the victim E and the victim G (the victim 20 years of age) were exposed to each of the above violence events in drinking, and the victim E were exposed to one time, and the victim E’s face was requested to change the bill of amendment as of July 11, 2014 did not state “the victim E and F,” but the part “victim F (19 years of age) and E” was changed to “victim D, F, and G,” respectively, and the victim E appears to have omitted the victim E’s right to make a statement “one-time face when drinking,” in light of the fact that the victim E made an additional statement (see the above part of investigation record, e.g., omitted).

The defendant was able to make a joint appearance of the victim D when he reaches his face.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims D, E, and G respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;