1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the judgment with regard to this part of basic facts are the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance.

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant’s representative director, around October 2013, committed a direct payment of the wages to G and H’s representatives, upon receiving a written consent for direct payment from the subcontractor company (hereinafter “KET”) from the subcontractor company, and that the Plaintiff directly delivered the Defendant’s representative director I by receiving a written consent for direct payment (Evidence A No. 2) from the KEex, and that the Defendant is obliged to pay the unpaid wages of KRW 27,80,000 to the Plaintiff.

The testimony of the witnessJ is insufficient to recognize that there was a direct payment agreement as alleged by the Plaintiff solely with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 2 (Unwritten Consent), 4 (J, A, K Fact Confirmation), 5-1, 2, and 3 (K’s statement, personal seal impression, and identification card) and the testimony of the witness J.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the court below.