A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle without registration 124cc.

On January 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the upper 03:05, and cross-sectioned the front of the friendly apartment 3-distance of Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Seowon-si into the upper 8-lane, with the center line facing the lower west and the lower west through the lower west bank.

Since there is a road where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to prevent accidents by driving the central right-hand road.

However, the Defendant neglected this to cross the road and went along the two-lanes of the opposite direction to the center line due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure, and led the victim B(34 ) driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes to the rear wheels part of the Defendant’s Oral Seaba car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the right side of the water unit, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

2. On January 15, 2017, the Defendant was placed in an emergency room of the Korean Marin Hospital in the Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, in order to treat the suffering from an accident described in paragraph 1, around 03:35 around 03:35, in order to treat the suffering from an accident.

At the entrance of the above emergency room D Assistant E, the defendant was asked about the circumstances of the case, and at the time, the defendant was hicked, hicked, hicked, hicked, hicked, hicked and hicked, and snicked.

Accordingly, the above E was driven by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a person, and from 03:49 on the same day to 04:40 on a total of four occasions, the defendant demanded that he/she comply with a drinking test, but the defendant did not comply with the demand without justifiable grounds.

3. The defendant is not insured by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).