logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.04.19 2012고단3464
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1,071,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The above additional collection shall be levied on the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Ulsan District Court on April 29, 201, sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months on May 7, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 7, 2011 and is not a person handling narcotics,

1. On September 201, 201, the Defendant received approximately 0.5g of psychotropic drugs from F in the F’s verification color car parking lot of “E” store in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and received approximately 0.5g of psychotropic drugs from F without compensation.

2. Around January 23, 2012, the Defendant received approximately 0.4g oponon from F within a passenger car driven by G parked in front of the Masan Station Masan-si synthetic Dong, Changwon-si without compensation.

3. Around January 30, 2012, the Defendant received approximately 0.4g oponon from F within a passenger car driven by the said G, which was parked in front of the Masan-gu synthetic Dong in Changwon-si, Masan-si.

4. On February 11, 2012, the Defendant received approximately 0.4g oponon from F within a passenger car driven by G parked in front of the Masan Station Masan-si synthetic Dong, Changwon-si without compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the first protocol of interrogation of the accused by the prosecution against the accused in part (F at the time and time of recording the facts of the crime)

1. Statement by each prosecutor's office with respect to F;

1. A person of F;

1. Investigation report (to analyze the contents of currency, to attach the telephone conversations between the suspect and the person who made a statement);

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: As long as their whereabouts cannot be known even by means of criminal records, previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation, and detection and investigation of F, F constitutes a situation in which it is impossible to make a statement due to “the unknown whereabouts”; and (1) If a statement is made only with the motive expected to expect favorable treatment from an investigative agency, it is deemed that another narcotics offender is made while being investigated by an investigative agency.

arrow