Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and A entered D carpet operated by the victim C(55 years old) into the same line.

1. On December 16, 2013, Defendants B and A’s interference with the performance of their duties wanted to drink, sing, singing, etc. On the grounds that the victim’s proprietor, completed his/her business and did not give an opportunity to singing out, Defendant A had his/her talked by “the same bit B bit B bit B bit B,” and Defendant B also interfered with the victim’s bar business by abusing the disturbance, such as “the bit B bit B’s bit B bit B bit B, who was sing down on the table table, and sing off the table table, and caused customers to leave the place, thereby interfering with the victim’s bar business by force.

2. Defendant A’s property damage caused damage to Defendant A’s property by gathering 300,000 won or more at the market price, which had been salved in an alone on the said date, at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on scene of crime;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment against the crime A: Articles 314 (1), 30 (Selection of Fine), and 366 (Selection of Destruction and Damage of Property, Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act; Articles 314 (1) and 30 (Selection of Fine): Article 314 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fine);

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act