Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the trade name of “D” from October 26, 2012 to B, and C, in light of the name of “D”.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking pursuant to the Act on the Initial Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products shall place a false place of origin labeling or conduct an act likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from November 15, 2012 to June 17, 2013, the Defendant purchased Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Korean

The purpose of sale is to prepare and provide a false indication of origin in the country of origin in the kimchi, as a method of making a false indication of Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Korean Korean Korean Korean Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the evidence and photographs of the violating business place, details of purchase by date, and receipts of purchase;

1. Article 15 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on the Initial Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant was aware of the fact that he did not indicate the origin of kimchi.

2. Determination

A. If the above assertion purports that it was unaware of the above law, it does not affect the establishment of a crime as a site of the law.

B. The above assertion is a crime.