logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.30 2018고정612
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 28, 2018, the Defendant damaged property due to the following reasons: (a) on the ground that he/she was in the North-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-si, and (b) the victim D (V, 56 years of age) was frightly and unbrupted, and that he/she was frighted, thereby damaging lighting lights equivalent to KRW 50,00 in the market value of the victim’s possession.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, insultd the victim at a place where there are four other than E, a guest, for the same reason. Whether the victim’s “scoping, opening, and waiting for a bet.”

In the context of “the victim was openly insultingd” and insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (the point of damage to property and the selection of fines)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the grounds for sentencing of the instant crime, the background leading up to the instant crime, the degree of damage to property and insult, the circumstances after the crime, etc., is recognized as erroneous by the Defendant. Prior to the instant case, there was no record of punishment except for the punishment of fines imposed twice, and the Defendant paid money equivalent to the value of the damaged property to the injured party, etc., by taking account of the various circumstances revealed in the instant pleadings, such as the fact that there was no record of punishment, and the Defendant paid

arrow