beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,898,870 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 23, 2015 to November 11, 2015.
Reasons
1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. 1) The Plaintiff is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract (including a special agreement on accident security) with respect to the respective car-based bareboat-based car owned by B and C, and D, with respect to the car-based car owned by B (hereinafter “accident”), around 02:00 on August 19, 2014, the Defendant caused a traffic accident (hereinafter “accident”) involving five passengers, including E, while driving the car due to the negligence of driving while driving the car on the part of B and C, and the F, E (hereinafter “accident”).
In the instant accident, E suffered bodily injury, such as the escape from the 5-6 conical signboards, Nos. 4, 5 chest pressure pressure, and the left-hand keel.
3) A lot damage insurance company, the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident, (hereinafter “slot damage insurance”).
(4) The Plaintiff agreed with E and agreed with the Defendant to exercise the right to claim compensation for damages against the Defendant, by asserting that the Defendant did not bear the obligation to pay the insurance proceeds in relation to the instant accident under the burden of KRW 6,340,130 according to the payment guarantee of medical expenses, and by asserting that the Defendant did not bear the obligation to pay the insurance proceeds in relation to the instant accident (29,500,000,000 won for non-life compensation, 5,239,500 won for non-life compensation, 34,000 won for non-life compensation as an insurer based on the status of the government security business trustee and the three non-life compensation security agreement entered into with B, and E., the Plaintiff agreed with E and agreed with the Defendant to exercise the right to claim compensation for damages against the Defendant.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 36,558,740,00 by April 22, 2015, for the agreed amount, other direct non-payment expenses, and other expenses.
5. On the other hand, in the lawsuit of confirming the existence of the obligation that was instituted by a lot damage insurance, " September 16, 2015" is related to the accident of this case.