Defendants not guilty

The summary of the facts charged [Basic Facts] Defendant A and Defendant B were father-related persons, and D Forest land 49,488 square meters (hereinafter “land before division”) was originally owned by Defendant E, the father of the said E, who is an absentee,. Defendant A sold 24,744/48 of each of the land before division to F and G on December 17, 1979, as an administrator of the said E, an absentee, sold the share of 49,488 and completed the registration of transfer of the share of the G ownership on March 28, 1985, on the basis of the provisional registration on June 3, 1997, upon the death of the said F on March 10, 195, the land was divided into “the victim H, I, K, 4444 square meters and the land before division (hereinafter “the land before division”). The land was divided into “the land before division”).

On the other hand, Defendant A: (a) divided the location of the land before subdivision into the O and the land after subdivision; (b) divided the former into the F; (c) sold the latter to G; (d) registered each co-ownership share of the entire land before subdivision as above for convenience; (c) installed boundary posts between D and the O land after subdivision after subdivision; (d) F divided the part of the land before subdivision into the land before subdivision; and (c) upon joint application of Defendant A and the victims and F’s successors, the mutual title trust relationship was established between F and F regarding each specific purchase; (d) the mutual title trust relationship was established between F and F; and (e) the Defendant A succeeded to the acquisition of the share from G again from F’s heir; and (e) the Defendant A completed the registration of each co-ownership share of the entire land after subdivision into the O land after subdivision.