Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2001, the Defendant was punished as an act of violence, including the issuance of a summary order of a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000, in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act at the order of the Gwangju District Court on April 10, 200. On November 13, 201, the Defendant was suspected of assaulting the Defendant’s spouse C, who is the Defendant’s spouse during the current period of deliberation of divorce, and was subject to a disposition of sending home protection cases at the office of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office on November 13, 201, and was subject to a disposition of sending

On September 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the second floor of the Korean-style Bio-resources building located in the center of the city-ro 27, the second floor of the Korean-Japan Life Insurance Co., Ltd., dispute over the change of the name of life insurance in the name of the victim C (In this case, 52 years old); (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant laid down the hand room lying on the right arms of the right arms, and laid down the victim over the floor; and (c) by taking three times the part of the victim’s right head head, the Defendant inflicted injury such as thale in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the intention of injury is denied and the facts charged are recognized as at the trial date on three occasions);

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to emergency measures reports;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing of the Defendant is not good, but the Defendant was smoothly agreed with the victim after the prosecution, and the attitude against the victim was expressed in the court. It is so decided as per Disposition in light of the following: (a) the status of divorce has been terminated.