logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.14 2014고정2020
공중위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the manager of "F (G)" who conducts 24 hours business in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and the defendant B is the operator of the public bath.

The access of juveniles shall be restricted from 22:00 to 05:00 on a public bath for 24-hour business.

1. Defendant A, at around 00:10 on March 16, 2014, entered the juvenile H (17 years of age) at the immediately preceding business establishment and did not observe the matters to be observed by the public health business entity.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), committed the above offense against Defendant A, who is an employee of the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a business report [Defendant A]

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 20 (2) 3 and 4 (7) of the Public Health Control Act by selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Defendant B] of the provisional payment order;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 of the Public Health Control Act, and Articles 20 (2) 3 and 4 (7) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act takes into account the following circumstances: the husband (I) of the defendant appears to mainly operate

arrow