logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.24 2016고단8915
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and a fine not exceeding ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business owner who operates a sexual traffic business in the name of "C" on the first floor of the building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On April 14, 2016, the Defendant advertised the above business site on the Internet site, such as D, and arranged commercial sex acts by the following methods from April 5, 2016 to April 14, 2016, including, but not limited to, sexual purchase, who had employed female employees E (SF), G, H, and H, and reported the advertisement and reported the advertisement. The Defendant: (a) received 50,000 won as the price for commercial sex trade from the J and caused the above “G” and the above E (SF) to engage in an act of interference that stimulates the sexual organ of the purchase of the above sex into the hands and with the face, respectively; and (b) arranged commercial sex acts by the said method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of suspect interrogation of the police to E, I and J;

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the same Act, and both imprisonment and fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., a relatively short period of business and a small size of business establishment, the primary crime, confession and reflective fact);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act on the community service order;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow