The defendant shall pay 16,50,000 won to the plaintiff and 12% per annum from October 17, 2019 to the day of complete payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a law firm that performs duties such as litigation and legal advice.

The defendant is a corporation authorized to establish an urban environment improvement project in B urban renewal promotion zone (hereinafter referred to as "project in this case").

B. On September 2016, the Defendant delegated C Limited Company (hereinafter “C”) with advisory and support duties regarding the instant project.

(c)

C delegated the Plaintiff on November 1, 2016 with legal advisory services on “C’s business activities”, and agreed to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 1,00,000 per month the advisory fees (excluding value added tax) in return for legal advisory services (hereinafter “instant contract”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant legal advisory services agreement”) and the pertinent advisory fees.

C On December 1, 2016, delegated the Plaintiff with legal advice services on the conclusion of the contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), “the contractor of the instant project” (hereinafter “D”), and agreed to pay KRW 400 million to the Plaintiff at the same time as the first intermediate payment after the commencement of the sale, in the event that the enforcement profit distribution ratio is adjusted to 6:4 (Execution Agency) and the contract is entered into with the content of reflecting C’s desired contents in connection with the sales promotion expenses, KRW 400 million out of the performance-based bonus amount to be paid at the time of the second intermediate payment, and KRW 50 million was paid at the same time as the second intermediate payment (hereinafter “instant contract”). The Plaintiff’s payment of the performance-based bonus to the Plaintiff’s representative on December 1, 2016, the second intermediate payment to KRW 400 million was made at the time of the execution of the contract.

F. On January 25, 2017, the construction contract for the instant project concluded between the Defendant, D, and C is “C” as “D 40% of the development gains.