1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 18, 201, the Plaintiff, who was assigned to the Labor Team and was missing after served in the Korean War, sought the personal information, contact details, etc. of the B’s volunteer service team at the time of the War Veterans in Daejeon, and sought his/her testimony to obtain a certificate of previous death from the Defendant on July 18, 2014 (hereinafter “instant information”).

1. The organization of labor history, the list of persons engaged in the military service at the time of the Korean War, and other list of persons engaged in the military service of persons engaged in military service;

2. A list of 114 persons who are the workers belonging to the labor force group and who have rendered distinguished services to veterans.

3. A list of persons drafted between January 1, 1951 and December 31, 1951, among the above 114 persons;

B. On July 22, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the Plaintiff’s claim for disclosure of information on the following grounds: (a) the instant information pertaining to an individual, such as the name, etc., is deemed likely to infringe on the privacy or freedom if disclosed; and (b)

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). 【The ground for recognition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s No. 1, 3, and 6, Eul’s Evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the need to guarantee citizens’ right to know is greater than the interests protected by non-disclosure, and even if the instant information pertaining to public matters is disclosed, it does not constitute a non-disclosure subject under Article 9(1)6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”). Nevertheless, the disposition rejecting the Plaintiff’s request for disclosure on the ground that disclosure of the instant information is likely to infringe on the privacy or freedom of private life is unlawful.

B. It is as stated in the relevant laws and regulations attached thereto.

C. Article 9 of the Information Disclosure Act.