The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are recognized, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided the errors, the fact that the value of the property acquired by the victim appears to be relatively minor, and the victim did not want to be punished against the defendant.

However, the crime of this case interferes with the victim's danran business twice (the first crime committed again after several hours, even though the police called out for the first crime). The crime of this case repeatedly committed each of the crimes against the same victim by being provided alcohol and alcohol from the victim who did not have an intent or ability to pay the price. In light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed repeatedly against the same victim, the defendant not only has the record of punishment several times due to the same crime, but also has been sentenced several times on April 14, 2015 (the defendant was sentenced two times). The government district court sentenced 8 months to punishment on April 12, 2015 and had been serving as a repeated offender on October 12, 2015 (the scope of punishment of each of this case; 1. The motive, result of the crime, age of the crime, the defendant's environment, family relationship, etc.; 2. The scope of punishment of punishment for each of this case within the scope of punishment [the range of punishment [the range of punishment of punishment for the same type of punishment [one month interfering in general punishment];